![]() ![]() IIRC, it was a 4.1 flashed to a 5.1, and upgraded to 2x 3.33GHz 6 core Zeon. So if you really want to blame someone for inaccurate scores, blame yourself, not BenchMate.About 2 years ago I bought a used Mac Pro on the eBay. So basically I am resposible that Geekbench 5 is measuring performance more accurately in one of the subtests.Īs for the second bug, if you give this a little thought, all scores in your database with systems affected by the "LAPIC timer bug" that were not done on Windows 7 are invalid. You have fixed the first bug thanks to my report. That neither Geekbench 3 or 4, neither your latest version 5 has ever mitigated the "LAPIC timer bug" on nearly all AMD platforms and Intel Pre-Skylake on Windows 8 and 10. That you left some profiling setting on that called QPC for 14 million times in a subtest, which influenced the result depending on the QPC's configured timer. That has been fixed on the first day of the release of Geekbench 5 and the BenchMate support!Īlso I'd like to sum up what BenchMate has done for you and your benchmark, just to make this perfectly clear:īecause of my work you were made aware. There was a small contention bug in the driver for 32 bit HPETs only because of your 14-million-timer-calls bug. I also don't think that people using benchmate are concerned about the stability or integrity of their os I am pretty sure most of them have an nlited or an accronis image for their benching os. The likely hood of Benchmate deleting files is not high and the likelihood of it being blamed on you is even lower since gb code is not being modified. I might have missed something but having just run gb in benchmate and standalone there doesn't seem to be an issue with score accuracy. We may be shooting ourselves in the foot here, but I fear this is very much a damned if we do, damned if we don't decision in which case I'd rather make the decision that gives us the most control over our destiny. On the legal size, what if Benchmate's modifications to Geekbench cause Geekbench to delete data from a user's system and we get sued because of it? On the technical side, Benchmate has introduced issues that have prevented Geekbench from working properly, or have prevented Geekbench from accurately measuring performance. I'm expecting final confirmation after I've sent him the first screens of the new wrapper.īenchmate integration introduces a number of issues for us, both technical and legal. Having learnt from the past, I'm also in contact with the developer of pifast and he has given his preliminary approval for integration. It will have its own command line interface wrapper, which is kind of cool.This will enable BenchMate to run all different kinds of command line benchmarks securely! So the future is in your own hands.Ībout the future of BenchMate: I'm working on the integration of pifast right now. Subsequently we should go forward with the community decision of letting Geekbench either stay or go. If I can't get official approval, I will remove the Geekbench's from BenchMate in the upcoming version sometime in the next few days. But if you give your official approval here for the support, I think we can bury the hatchet and leave things as they are. There is nothing devious about being curious about what is running on your Any chance you have reconsidered your claim to pursue legal action for supporting Geekbench? I'm not talking about distribution, that's off the table. You can use programs like Process Monitor or API Monitor to get insights like this into applications. This results in a JSON after the run has finished. You can do this yourself if you just call geekbench_x86_64.exe for example with the parameters "-cpu -backend". The capturing of results is done by tracking and parsing the standard output return value of the inner geekbench executable. All Tryout limitations are honored, BenchMate just fixes the timer issues by checking if the timer functions used are skewing in between the run time (not on every timestamp, just before and after the run). I also think that BenchMate (in any version) does not in any way subvert any license requirements of Geekbench, neither by intent nor by mistake. BenchMate 0.9 fixed that and makes Tryout versions available as well. I have a licensed GB version myself and therefore did not anticipate the differences. That was a "bug", that actually led to some people buying the full license during the BenchMate testing competition. Every version of BenchMate before 0.9 could only handle a licensed Geekbench. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |